SB79 – New Development – Major Concern

SB79 – New Development – Major Concern

Recently met with Kevin Keller and received an alarming update:

  • Planning is considering recommending rear setbacks of ONLY 4 feet
  • Current standard: 15 feet
  • Applies to areas impacted by SB 79 implementation

This is exactly what stakeholders warned about—and why outreach was critical.


Why This Matters

Reducing setbacks from 15 ft to 4 ft would:

  • Eliminate usable backyard space
  • Reduce or eliminate trees and open space
  • Create overcrowded conditions in existing neighborhoods
  • Set a dangerous precedent for future legislation impacting single-family areas

“Existing” reduced setbacks could become the new citywide standard


No Justification Provided

  • Planning has not provided data showing this reduction is necessary
  • Stakeholders submitted graphics and analysis demonstrating:
    • SB 79 density targets can be achieved with 15 ft setbacks intact

Conclusion: This change appears policy-driven—not evidence-based.


Consistent with Broader Concerns

This issue directly reinforces what we heard in the recent PlanCheckNCLA meeting:

1. Over-Zoning Without Real Outcomes

  • Increasing density alone is not producing housing
  • Projects remain stalled due to:
    • Cost, financing, insurance, labor

2. Infrastructure Still Not Addressed

  • No comprehensive analysis of:
    • Sewer capacity
    • Aging infrastructure
  • Yet density continues to increase

3. Loss of Community Input

  • Decisions are being advanced with:
    • Limited transparency
    • Minimal stakeholder engagement

This setback reduction is another example of top-down decision-making


Where This Goes Next

  • Draft goes to the Planning Commission (expected ~May 14)
  • Then to City Council for final decision

Councilmembers will be the final decision-makers


Position / Recommendation

We strongly oppose the proposed reduction in rear setbacks and recommend:

Maintain Current Standards

  • Retain 15 ft rear setbacks
  • Do not establish new reduced baseline

Require Data-Based Planning

  • Any changes must be supported by:
    • Clear analysis
    • Demonstrated necessity

Protect Neighborhood Livability

  • Preserve:
    • Open space
    • Tree canopy
    • Light and air

Pause Policy Changes Without Full Review

  • Align zoning decisions with:
    • Infrastructure capacity
    • Real development feasibility

Call to Action

We are continuing outreach and need your help:

  • ✔ Continue sending letters to Councilmembers
  • ✔ Request meetings with your representatives
  • ✔ Watch for upcoming “click & send” letter campaign for Planning Commission
  • ✔ Prepare comments for Planning Commission hearing (mid-May)

For United Neighbors – Maria, Jeff, Cindy, Marc. email: mpkalban@gmail.com

The louder and more consistent we are, the more impact we have.


Closing

This is a critical moment.

Reducing setbacks may seem like a small technical change—but it has major, long-term consequences for neighborhoods across Los Angeles.

We must ensure that planning decisions are:

  • Thoughtful
  • Data-driven
  • Balanced with community needs

We will continue to advocate strongly—and we appreciate everyone standing with us.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *